On Sunday, February 5, 2023 7:58:50 PM CET, Phyllis Smith wrote:
> Yes, it is "pretty interesting" -- you certainly have a way of
> doing things that no one ever expected to be done !
I'll take it as a compliment.
It is a compliment! Generally when a new feature was added in the past, it was in direct response to a user request for something specific and that is how it was designed. And then creative users come along and take advantage of the new feature to do something a little different.
> Again, was not designed with this usage in mind but never the less, maybe
> it could work?
My edit flow was changed because I could not get the OpenEDL to work in the
way that was described by creating subprojects and using a Reference EDL in
the main project. That works quite nicely, and gives separation of
concerns. Yes, it would be nice to switch between these projects without
closing the main project...
OpenEDL section in the manual needs to be better written and I am "secretly" hoping that Igor will review it and fix what is stated wrong because it looks like I wrote that original section and as things came up, just shoved in changes. I am sure Andrea added some improvements.
@Igor; I am still in the process of screenrecording what I am doing
"wrong".
"Wrong" can just mean "unexpected" -- I do this all the time.
--
Stefan