ср, 4 окт. 2023 г., 04:28 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017@gmail.com>:
OK, will work on getting the build to work as I mentioned earlier.  Next time a new version of ffmpeg is released, we should probably upgrade and not wait for the ".1" release which is what we have traditionally done.  If we had known how long 6.1 was going to take, we would have used 6.0.

P.S. sorry for the late responses, I had the "handyman from hell" "supposedly helping" me today with some physical yard work.


Well, at least we can hope you will not get a lot of rains ... they are necessary, but made outdoors work a little more complicated ....


On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 7:22 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu@gmail.com> wrote:


ср, 4 окт. 2023 г., 03:55 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017@gmail.com>:
Started to test now, but my build failed so will probably not get it going until tomorrow so will let you know then.


Thanks anyway , I hope need for this patch will go away as we update ffnv headers ....


On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:39 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu@gmail.com> wrote:
this one apparently work better, in sense it compiles!

can anyone check if cuda/nvenc hw acceleration still works with it?

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:53 PM Andrew Randrianasulu
<randrianasulu@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Because ffmpeg 6.1 still not branched I guess we better to look into relevant changes ... and adapt our patch.