Den 02.12.2023 08:20, skrev Андрей Спицын via Cin:
Hello Phyllis, Terje and Andrew

Thanks for testing!

I have some experience with rpm-based systems. Why does dnf select the i686 architecture in the first place? On Debian based systems, apt selects the original architecture of the system by default.

Andrew, I think the spec file should be architecture agnostic. Otherwise I'll have to patch it when I add i686 or arm64 builder.

Best regards,
Andrey


I don't use 'dnf' on Leap 15.5 but openSUSE's own package manager 'zypper' (optional supplemented with  'rpm' or 'YaST2' gui).
To compare with my previous installation output (last section) on Leap
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2023-November/007254.html

the 'libsuil-0-0-0.10.18-lp155.32.12.x86_64.rpm' was correct reported as a dependice and add-installed during the Cinelerra installation.

Now to verify on the latest Cinelerra rpm installation on Leap:

zypper se -is cinelerra
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...

S  | Name      | Type    | Version      | Arch   | Repository
---+-----------+---------+--------------+--------+------------------
i+ | cinelerra | package | 5.1-20231201 | x86_64 | (System Packages)

and to check the 'libsuil' dependice for the installed rpm using zypper and rpm (the latter can also be checked on Fedora)
zypper info --requires cinelerra | grep libsuil
    libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit)

rpm -qR cinelerra | grep libsuil
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit)

A tip might be a README file as earlier with installation suggestions/experiences for LEAP/Tumbleweed, Fedora/RHEL and other distributions
https://cinelerra-gg.org/download/README.pkgs


сб, 2 дек. 2023 г., 03:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin <cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>:
Thanks Terje !  works much better now once I installed the x86_64 version, which should have been automatic in the first place.
Sorry Andrey for my dumb mistake -- it installed from the build farm and works just fine -- I just wanted to test it.

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:54 PM Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017@gmail.com> wrote:
Terje, nice catch and definitely wrong BUT can not understand why that happened?!

On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:40 PM Terje J. Hanssen via Cin <cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:
Phyllis,

Maybe a stupid question, but as you have suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686 installed:
Is this 32bit lib just just added to 64bit or a base 32bit (i686) Fedora OS?

Terje

Den 01.12.2023 23:46, skrev Phyllis Smith via Cin:
Andrey, this is NOT Important as I was just playing around with a newly installed Fedora 38, but here is what went wrong.

# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
# dnf install libsuil-0.so.0
...
Installed:
  suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686
...
# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64

I will see if I can find the exact older version needed and install it instead.

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 5:14 AM Андрей Спицын <spitsyn.andrey@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Phyllis and everyone,

I've created a build farm for cinelerra deb and rpm packages. Although it is at an early stage of development, it can build packages on every git change in the main repo. Feel free to use these packages at https://github.com/einhander/cin-gg-packages/releases. Note that releases correspond to a build date, not a git commit date.
Current build hosts are debian 12 and alma linux 8. I'm open to suggestions for a new distro and packages.


Best regards,
Andrey Spitsyn


--
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
--
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin