В сообщении от Thursday 03 December 2020 02:24:44 Phyllis Smith via Cin написал(а):
Andrew, probably eventually these print statements should be removed after the patch has had more use to ensure the aspect ratio and different interlacing of different varieties is known to being reported correctly. Otherwise it is hard to see errors instead.
sure, I just left them because I saw some files with real strange (display) aspect ratio... will comment out soon I was trying to understand why some interlaced files still not detected as such, for example this https://samples.ffmpeg.org/archive/video/mjpeg/ https://samples.ffmpeg.org/archive/video/mjpeg/avi%2Bmjpeg%2Bpcm_s16le%2B%2B... mediainfo reports it correctly (I hope) but cinGG still not ..... I was looking into adding same reporting as in https://sourceforge.net/p/mediainfo/feature-requests/484/ https://github.com/MediaArea/MediaInfoLib/commit/33776815ae717bfc2f52042f455... BUT apparently this file doesn't even have this 'vprp' header! On image front I tried to load bmp and tif - they both worked. I initially was fooled by how snapshots appeared correctly in media area, but as I can see now they used native decoder, not ffmpeg's ....
sample_aspect_ratio, 1.000000
display_aspect_ratio, 1.777778 ff_aspect_ratio, 1.777778 interlace from demux: 0