Den 10.11.2022 14:56, skrev Andrew
Randrianasulu:
Den 10.11.2022 01:09, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
Den 08.11.2022 20:30, skrev Andrew
Randrianasulu:
also see
click on
details look for mpeg2
files
oh, look 29.97!
11 gb in full
but we hopefully need only
part of it for testing ....
also this
they also 29.97
thing is, while bdwrite
does not choke on those - resulting
udfs displays errors if I not
transcode audio first ... (
Just
to mentione that I downloaded the latter
file, B01C013.mpg
and checked its video format with
mediainfo reported
FileExtension_Invalid
: ts m2t m2s m4t m4s tmf ts tp trp ty
yeah, extension IS wrong
ffmpeg -v error -i B01C013.mpg -f null -
2>error.log
and
cat error.log
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989aae8500] Invalid
frame dimensions 0x0.
Last message repeated 12 times
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989ad2c980] 00
motion_type at 11 13
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989ad2c980] Warning MVs
not available
I think those are there because file
was force-cut by byte boundary, not by
frame/content boundary?
you can try some other files if you
have bandwidth to burn :)
I don't know if the above imply anything,
but the small "3.m2t" file had none such
error messages ......?
About the same errors for another FX1_01.mpg
FileExtension_Invalid
[mpeg2video @ 0x5598692b9500] Invalid frame dimensions
0x0.
Last message repeated 2 times
[mpeg2video @ 0x55986953ccc0] invalid cbp -1 at 74 53
[mpeg2video @ 0x55986953ccc0] Warning MVs not available
The first I would expect the first is due to change from
M2T transport stream to internet MPG program stream(?)
well, I hoped internet archive uploader will not
change files just because, but who knows, may be it changed
more than extension ....
On of previous discussion of some interest
https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/general-hd-720-1080-acquisition/96546-difference-between-m2t-mpg.html
By the way, when I'm home again I have my own true HDV
1080i.m2t from FX7E to test on, beside the downloaded
2008xxx.m2t
And next month CinGG app release will include the
interlace patched bdwrite, right?
I am not sure my idea is good, considering I do
not know how to detect those pulldown flags ... If your camera
has this 'film' mode it will be interesting to get sample ....
No, my HDR-FX7E uses consumer standard 1080i at 50i (25 fps) or HDV2
(Sony/Canon). The other type was 720p or HDV1 (JVC)
The first HDV 1080i camcorder to implement recording progressive
video within an interlaced stream,was the Sony HVR-V1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV#HDV_1080i
I certainly do not understand the problem regarding bdwrite. If
automatic detection of interlaced video cannot be recognized i.e via
ffmpeg, possibly the user can tell it the same way NLE's
pre-requisit.