Den 09.01.2024 23:05, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
вт, 9 янв. 2024 г., 23:49 Terje J. Hanssen <[email protected]>:
................
As seen above, FFmpeg 6.0.1 has a "cleaner output" without the dual set of [ SAR DAR ] in brackets as from FFmpeg 4.4.4 on Leap https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2024-January/007654.html
well, may be it was container/codec differentiation? I think for troubleshooting issues we better to report both values in our "asset - info - details" ...
I don't know if the AppImages *cin_svt_aspect-ratio* (Andrea) and *cin-x86_64 *(Phyllis) are quite identical or of same patch-levels. But for both AppImages I used the _same_ *DV* and *HDV* source files, s*vt-av1* and *opus webm* rendering, without any Set>Format input from my side. As I have installed TW-SR/*cin_svt_aspect-ratio*/FFmpeg6 and LP15/*cin-x86_64/*FFmpeg4 in dualboot on the same workstation, I have cross-tested both set of outputs. In the comparison tables below, the file names suffixed *_tw.webm* are rendered on Tumbleweed_Slowroll, *FF6* is ffprobe output on ditto Tw-Sr, while, *FF4* are ditto on LP15. cin_svt_aspect-ratio rendering on tw-sr --------------------------------------- FF6 ffprobe -hide_banner dv01_07_cingg_svt-av1+opus_tw.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(pc, bt709/unknown/unknown), 720x576, SAR 16:15 DAR 4:3, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn FF4 ffprobe -hide_banner dv01_07_cingg_svt-av1+opus_tw.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(pc, bt709/unknown/unknown), 720x576 [SAR 1:1 DAR 5:4], SAR 16:15 DAR 4:3, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc FF6 ffprobe -hide_banner hdv07_05_cingg_svt-av1+opus_tw.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(pc, bt709/unknown/unknown), 1440x1080, SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn FF4 ffprobe -hide_banner hdv07_05_cingg_svt-av1+opus_tw.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(pc, bt709/unknown/unknown), 1440x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 4:3], SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc cin-x86_64 rendering on lp15 ---------------------------- FF6 fprobe -hide_banner dv01_07_cingg_svt-av1+opus.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(tv, bt709/unknown/unknown), 720x576, SAR 16:15 DAR 4:3, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn FF4 ffprobe -hide_banner dv01_07_cingg_svt-av1+opus.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(tv, bt709/unknown/unknown), 720x576 [SAR 1:1 DAR 5:4], SAR 16:15 DAR 4:3, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc FF6 ffprobe -hide_banner hdv07_05_cingg_svt-av1+opus.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(tv, bt709/unknown/unknown), 1440x1080, SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn FF4 ffprobe -hide_banner hdv07_05_cingg_svt-av1+opus.webm Stream #0:0: Video: av1 (Main), yuv420p(tv, bt709/unknown/unknown), 1440x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 4:3], SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 1k tbn, 1k tbc
Can you try few more clips of different nature just to see if it works in more cases? :)
I will report differences if discovered