t is good the way you have it. Before the patch, when progressive media was input and the Deinterlace box was NOT checked, "mediainfo" always displayed "Interlaced, Top Field First". Mediainfo is not always 100%.
Phyllis; In comparision, how is the video detected with ffmpeg -filter:v idet
I checked a couple of CinGG dvd_... created directories (since I have been doing so much testing, did not want to check all 50 though). Displaying result of one: *Mediainfo results: * Scan type : Interlaced Scan order : Top Field First *ffmpeg -filter:v idet -frames:v 100 ... of same file:* Input #0, mpegvideo, from '/tmp/dvd_20230606-101640/dvd.m2v': Duration: N/A, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p(tv, smpte170m, *top first*), ... ... [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x445b640] Repeated Fields: Neither: 101 Top: 0 Bottom: 0 [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x445b640] Single frame detection: *TFF: 0 BFF: 0 Progressive: 69 Undetermined: 32* [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x445b640] Multi frame detection: *TFF: 0 BFF: 0 Progressive: 86 Undetermined: 15* *BUT when run it over the entire file instead of just 100 frames:* Input #0, mpegvideo, from '/tmp/dvd_20230606-101640/dvd.m2v': Duration: N/A, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: mpeg2video (Main), yuv420p(tv, smpte170m, *top first*), ... ... [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x42c04c0] Repeated Fields: Neither: 679 Top: 0 Bottom: 0 [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x42c04c0] Single frame detection: *TFF: 10 BFF: 3* Progressive: 487 Undetermined: 179 [Parsed_idet_0 @ 0x42c04c0] Multi frame detection: *TFF: 18 BFF: 4* Progressive: 642 Undetermined: 15 Getting too bogged down in interlacing -- the only thing that is important is what it actually looks like on the TV or monitor that it will actually be viewed on !!