Hello Phyllis, Terje and AndrewThanks for testing!I have some experience with rpm-based systems. Why does dnf select the i686 architecture in the first place? On Debian based systems, apt selects the original architecture of the system by default.Andrew, I think the spec file should be architecture agnostic. Otherwise I'll have to patch it when I add i686 or arm64 builder.
In rpm 4.6.0, the concept of ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) was introduced to permit differentiating between 32- and 64-bit versions without resorting to file dependencies on obscure and/or library-version dependent paths. To declare a dependency on a package name architecture specific, append %{?_isa} to the dependency name, eg
Requires: libbar-devel%{?_isa} >= 2.2
This will expand to libbar-devel(archfamily-bitness) depending on the build target architecture, for example a native build on x86_64 would give
Requires: libbar-devel(x86-64) >= 2.2
but with –target i386 (or i586, i686 etc) it would become
Requires: libbar-devel(x86-32) >= 2.2
Note that this requires all the involved packages must have been built with rpm >= 4.6.0, older versions do not add the necessary name(isa) provides to packages.
Best regards,Andreyсб, 2 дек. 2023 г., 03:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin <cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org>:Thanks Terje ! works much better now once I installed the x86_64 version, which should have been automatic in the first place.Sorry Andrey for my dumb mistake -- it installed from the build farm and works just fine -- I just wanted to test it.--On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:54 PM Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017@gmail.com> wrote:Terje, nice catch and definitely wrong BUT can not understand why that happened?!On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:40 PM Terje J. Hanssen via Cin <cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:Phyllis,--
Maybe a stupid question, but as you have suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686 installed:
Is this 32bit lib just just added to 64bit or a base 32bit (i686) Fedora OS?
Terje
Den 01.12.2023 23:46, skrev Phyllis Smith via Cin:
Andrey, this is NOT Important as I was just playing around with a newly installed Fedora 38, but here is what went wrong.
# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64# dnf install libsuil-0.so.0...Installed:
suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686
...
# rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
I will see if I can find the exact older version needed and install it instead.
On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 5:14 AM Андрей Спицын <spitsyn.andrey@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Phyllis and everyone,
I've created a build farm for cinelerra deb and rpm packages. Although it is at an early stage of development, it can build packages on every git change in the main repo. Feel free to use these packages at https://github.com/einhander/cin-gg-packages/releases. Note that releases correspond to a build date, not a git commit date.
Current build hosts are debian 12 and alma linux 8. I'm open to suggestions for a new distro and packages.
Best regards,Andrey Spitsyn
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin