Den 11.12.2022 16:53, skrev Terje J.
Hanssen:
UDF is told to have
replaced ISO for optical CD/DVD/BD discs.
https://askanydifference.com/difference-between-udf-and-iso-with-table/
I wonder if someone can clarify if UDF version 2.5 or higher
really is required for creating and burning Blu-ray video to
VBD-discs.
I've got this impression earlier, i.e for K3b here, which still
seems to be much the case on Linux:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602
I've seen there could be UDF 2.5 on Ubuntu and possibly with
tsMuxer(?)
Bt in my case on Leap 15.4, and even on Tumbleweed, the latest
available udf package versions are 2.1 and 2.3:
S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository
---+----------+-------+-----------------+--------+----------------
i+ | libudf0 | pakke | 2.1.0-1.27 | x86_64 | Main
Repository
i+ | udftools | pakke | 2.3-lp154.321.3 | x86_64 | 15.4
udftools 2.3 is even an experimental package from OBS with
content
/usr/bin/udfinfo
/usr/bin/wrudf
/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-pktsetup.rules
/usr/sbin/mkfs.udf
/usr/sbin/mkudffs
/usr/sbin/pktcdvd-check
/usr/sbin/pktsetup
/usr/sbin/udflabel
So what happends and decide the udf file system version when
using mkudffs, bdwrite and dd or K3b lastly for burning?
when I let K3b autodect the image (because there are no
selection for UDF), it actually shows "ISO 9660" while burning.
And the result has prooved to be playable Blu-ray discs in hw
player.
First, to correct one
possibly confusing typo above: VBD-discs should be Blu-ray video
discs
To add An extract from udfinfo for one of my burned BD-RE dscs:
udfinfo /dev/sr0 | grep udf
udfinfo: Warning: Device '/dev/sr0' is busy, udfinfo may report
bogus information
udfinfo: Warning: Second and third Anchor Volume Descriptor
Pointer not found
udfinfo: Warning: Logical Volume is in inconsistent state
appid=*Linux mkudffs 2.3
udfrev=2.01
udfwriterev=2.01