Den 10.11.2022 14:56, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
Den 10.11.2022 01:09, skrev Andrew
Randrianasulu:
Den 08.11.2022 20:30, skrev
Andrew Randrianasulu:
also
see
click
on details
look for mpeg2
files
oh,
look 29.97!
11
gb in full but we
hopefully need
only part of it
for testing ....
also this
they also
29.97
thing is,
while bdwrite does not
choke on those -
resulting udfs displays
errors if I not transcode
audio first ... (
Just to
mentione that I downloaded the
latter file, B01C013.mpg
and checked its video format
with
mediainfo reported
FileExtension_Invalid : ts m2t m2s m4t m4s tmf ts tp
trp ty
yeah, extension IS wrong
ffmpeg -v error -i B01C013.mpg
-f null - 2>error.log
and
cat error.log
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989aae8500]
Invalid frame dimensions 0x0.
Last message repeated 12
times
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989ad2c980]
00 motion_type at 11 13
[mpeg2video @ 0x55989ad2c980]
Warning MVs not available
I think those are there
because file was force-cut by byte
boundary, not by frame/content
boundary?
you can try some other
files if you have bandwidth to burn :)
I don't know if the above
imply anything, but the small
"3.m2t" file had none such
error messages ......?
About the same errors for another
FX1_01.mpg
FileExtension_Invalid
[mpeg2video @ 0x5598692b9500] Invalid frame
dimensions 0x0.
Last message repeated 2 times
[mpeg2video @ 0x55986953ccc0] invalid cbp -1
at 74 53
[mpeg2video @ 0x55986953ccc0] Warning MVs
not available
The first I would expect the first is due to
change from M2T transport stream to internet
MPG program stream(?)
well, I hoped internet archive
uploader will not change files just because, but
who knows, may be it changed more than extension
....
On of previous discussion of some interest
https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/general-hd-720-1080-acquisition/96546-difference-between-m2t-mpg.html
By the way, when I'm home again I have my
own true HDV 1080i.m2t from FX7E to test on,
beside the downloaded 2008xxx.m2t
And next month CinGG app release will
include the interlace patched bdwrite,
right?
I am not sure my idea is good,
considering I do not know how to detect those
pulldown flags ... If your camera has this 'film'
mode it will be interesting to get sample ....
No, my HDR-FX7E uses consumer standard 1080i at 50i (25
fps) or HDV2 (Sony/Canon). The other type was 720p or
HDV1 (JVC)
The first HDV 1080i camcorder to implement recording
progressive video within an interlaced stream,was the
Sony HVR-V1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV#HDV_1080i
I certainly do not understand the problem regarding
bdwrite. If automatic detection of interlaced video
cannot be recognized i.e via ffmpeg, possibly the user
can tell it the same way NLE's pre-requisit.