Den 16.01.2024 20:50, skrev Phyllis Smith:
Just wondering why not just use?

I don't think I had or used native SD 16:9 sources and that paper was ffmpeg and tsmuxer based.
(Else I experimented a bit with cropping 4:3 to 16:9 using DeVeDe, but that is throwing some of the images away)


On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 6:02 PM Terje J. Hanssen via Cin <cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:
According to wikipedia, 16:9 SD video formats are also valid BD-Video formats
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blu-ray#Video

SD   720 × 480 29.97i     4:3 or 16:9[d] (anamorhic)
     720 × 576 25i        4:3 or 16:9[d]

The Create BD Format contains 720 x 576/ 25i/p and 720 x 480/ 29.97i/p

Please verify if this these are SD 4:3 only?
The wikipedia table lists only SD interlaced as valid SD BD-Video format

If so, SD 16:9 interlaced are missing, while SD progressive are invalid?
--
Cin mailing list
Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin