I wrote a short introduction for chapter 7 of the manual, the one with the rendering options. I am not sure it is necessary so I am attaching, in addition to the latex version, a txt version. Judge whether it should be included. In this case it should be put at the beginning, as the first paragraph.
Well to me it is a good introduction because if you read this, you can start rendering without having to read anymore. I will wait to see if anyone else comments (and as usual, I might change the wording a little which Andrea does not seem to object to). Thank you. On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:49 AM Andrea paz via Cin < [email protected]> wrote:
I wrote a short introduction for chapter 7 of the manual, the one with the rendering options. I am not sure it is necessary so I am attaching, in addition to the latex version, a txt version. Judge whether it should be included. In this case it should be put at the beginning, as the first paragraph. -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
Checked into the GIT for the Manual. Like said previously, instead of having to read the entire chapter on Rendering, it is easy to get started by just checking these 3 items as Andrea has documented.
I wrote a short introduction for chapter 7 of the manual, the one with the rendering options.
I'm sorry Phyllis but I explained the Compositor thing wrong. I meant that a fourth item, that is, using the tools in the Compositing window during editing, could affect the result of the render file. Instead it does not: all operations in the Compositor window do not affect the render, only the three items that are listed have influence. I had put a sentence inside the "timeline" item because it is in the Compositor that we see the timeline and we might be led to think that these tools are also influential. But the Compositor only serves as a display for the timeline. It may be best to remove the Compositor part. Sorry for the confusion I created.
Andrea, I think it is explained just fine and I would actually like to leave it in. My reasoning is that by saying "While the rendering is in progress some frames from the timeline are displayed in the Compositor window, but it has no bearing on the actual rendering process" it makes it clear to the user that it does not affect the render (i.e. has no bearing). The first time I saw the compositor changing the image while I executed my first render, I was wondering what that was. By leaving it in, it clarifies that for the user. However, if you prefer it to be removed, I will do so. Thanks, Phyllis explained the Compositor thing wrong. I meant
that a fourth item, that is, using the tools in the Compositing window
during editing, could affect the result of the render file. Instead it does not: all operations in the Compositor window do not affect the render, only the three items that are listed have influence. I had put a sentence inside the "timeline" item because it is in the Compositor that we see the timeline and we might be led to think that these tools are also influential. But the Compositor only serves as a display for the timeline. It may be best to remove the Compositor part.
I would prefer tò remove the references tò Compositore, It serms tò me that It leads tò more confusione.
OK, it is removed in GIT. On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:26 PM Andrea paz <[email protected]> wrote:
I would prefer tò remove the references tò Compositore, It serms tò me that It leads tò more confusione.
participants (2)
-
Andrea paz -
Phyllis Smith