cppcheck-related patches
After being beaten by missing returns I tried to re-run cppcheck 2.8 over cin-gg codebase. Few issues I do not know how to correct, for others I have patches to test I think they definitely for next month testing
OK, sounds good. I am going to create the May AppImage releases tomorrow on the 31st. And also next month will be finishing up megapatch_12 with 0059-0061 of libbthread and others I missed (except not 0002 or 0051) and hoping that FFmpeg 5.1 will be released. On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:30 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
After being beaten by missing returns I tried to re-run cppcheck 2.8 over cin-gg codebase.
Few issues I do not know how to correct, for others I have patches to test
I think they definitely for next month testing
Andrew, I have installed these on my system and will run a few things to see if all seems OK. The patches look good though except I am confused by the name inclusion of "Experimental" on the "voids" and one of the "return 0". On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:30 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
After being beaten by missing returns I tried to re-run cppcheck 2.8 over cin-gg codebase.
Few issues I do not know how to correct, for others I have patches to test
I think they definitely for next month testing
I tried to do a build with cppcheck patches. All OK. (I also tried to compile the OpenCVs from git and realized that even these (besides the ones in our git) do not integrate SURF, only the free algorithms.)
Checked into GIT these 7 cppchecks. Thank you Andrew. I tried to do a build with cppcheck patches. All OK.
And thank you Andrea for building and running CinGG with these changes in case any problems.
(I also tried to compile the OpenCVs from git and realized that even these (besides the ones in our git) do not integrate SURF, only the free algorithms.)
Yes that is true and so that is why the one we are using for CinGG is the last one where SURF was still default and no non-free flag was needed.
In theory I restored access to my gmail via new tablet ..next - software installation .. чт, 2 июн. 2022 г., 04:44 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:
Andrew, I have installed these on my system and will run a few things to see if all seems OK. The patches look good though except I am confused by the name inclusion of "Experimental" on the "voids" and one of the "return 0".
On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 5:30 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
After being beaten by missing returns I tried to re-run cppcheck 2.8 over cin-gg codebase.
Few issues I do not know how to correct, for others I have patches to test
I think they definitely for next month testing
participants (3)
-
Andrea paz -
Andrew Randrianasulu -
Phyllis Smith