Sorry, I just saw recent commit message in Cin git: https://git.cinelerra-gg.org/git/?p=goodguy/cinelerra.git;a=commit;h=f377b33... "back out dav1d 0.6.0->0.5.1 nasm incompatible most systems [...]" partially my fault because I not checked this requirement (I have nasm nasm-2.14.02-i586-1). I can dig up some recompiling tips relatively easily, I did some of this last year, but this still will require some manual action. (i don't think you want /me as buildmaster ...) Was openexr 2.4.1 stuff Ok enough for rebuild? https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM you can get srpm from http://sisyphus.ru/en/srpm/Sisyphus/nasm/get https://wiki.debian.org/BuildingAPackage you can get dsc files from https://packages.debian.org/ru/sid/nasm Sorry, I don't have my external hdd with Virtual Machines ready ....
Andrew:
Sorry, I just saw recent commit message in Cin git: ... partially my fault because I not checked this requirement (I have nasm nasm-2.14.02-i586-1).
No, it is NOT any of your fault. *It is the dav**1d developers fault. * We have strived to keep up with new stuff but now gg is pretty disgusted and is backing off on library upgrades going forward. Wants to spend more time with Cinelerra code because is is more fun. We have to rely on users like you, MatN, IgorB, and Andrea to report early problems with the build so we do not get blind-sided for the end of the month builds.
I can dig up some recompiling tips relatively easily, I did some of this last year, but this still will require some manual action. (i don't think you want /me as buildmaster ...)
The problem with being a buildmaster is the requirement for a computer with many, many cpu-s or else it is not possible to do monthly builds as it would take too long. Too many supported distros and I like the idea of keeping older operating system versions available, to even include 32-bit (that may have to be dropped in the future).
Was openexr 2.4.1 stuff Ok enough for rebuild?
We are glad you worked with OpenEXR 2.4.1 and supplied the patches as it gave gg motivation to do the upgrade (before he got disgusted with this library too). However, he looked at your patches; then he looked at the current way 2.2.1 worked; and then went a whole different way! That sometimes happens.
gg/Phyllis
В сообщении от Thursday 19 March 2020 22:47:43 Phyllis Smith написал(а):
Andrew:
Sorry, I just saw recent commit message in Cin git: ... partially my fault because I not checked this requirement (I have nasm nasm-2.14.02-i586-1).
No, it is NOT any of your fault. *It is the dav**1d developers fault. * We have strived to keep up with new stuff but now gg is pretty disgusted and is backing off on library upgrades going forward. Wants to spend more time with Cinelerra code because is is more fun. We have to rely on users like you, MatN, IgorB, and Andrea to report early problems with the build so we do not get blind-sided for the end of the month builds.
I can dig up some recompiling tips relatively easily, I did some of this last year, but this still will require some manual action. (i don't think you want /me as buildmaster ...)
The problem with being a buildmaster is the requirement for a computer with many, many cpu-s or else it is not possible to do monthly builds as it would take too long. Too many supported distros and I like the idea of keeping older operating system versions available, to even include 32-bit (that may have to be dropped in the future).
/me likes idea of working 32-bit build too ... But I was thinking about doing 'admin' stuff remotely on your (xen) machines.. this might be bad or wrong idea, I never tried to upgrade/fix production server .... but at least I can offload some of more mechanical aspects of keeping up with fast-moving software world .... (but I don't think I'll able to revert c++14 changes from somelib, because I don't know c/++ nearly anywhere near enough...) see https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/bugtracker/view.php?id=390
Was openexr 2.4.1 stuff Ok enough for rebuild?
We are glad you worked with OpenEXR 2.4.1 and supplied the patches as it gave gg motivation to do the upgrade (before he got disgusted with this library too). However, he looked at your patches; then he looked at the current way 2.2.1 worked; and then went a whole different way! That sometimes happens.
it worked - so one less problem for now .....
gg/Phyllis
participants (2)
-
Andrew Randrianasulu -
Phyllis Smith