[Cin] CinGG AppImage
mnieuw at zap.a2000.nl
Tue Feb 23 21:13:40 CET 2021
I think it is a good idea too.
I have done some editing, and found no problems. But I am not a heavy
Maybe in a separate section of the download page, and then maybe the
Keep the similar naming? Like
or using CinGG in honor of Bill:
or something else. How many 32 bit distro users are there?
@Phyllis, if you can build from the 20201031 release code, then maybe
that should be the first one on there? So people can compare the
AppImage with the package-style release of the same vintage, and we
have a reference in case of things not working as they used to be.
Then because there will only be two versions ("older" and "newer")
there could be a few more "previous" ones than the 1 previous there is
And it should be mentioned what the differences are between old and
new, and when you should use one or the other.
I have not tested cmd line parameter -r for batch rendering, not sure
if there are any other cmd line options I should test.
On Tue, 2021-02-23 at 08:23 -0700, Phyllis Smith via Cin wrote:
> Good idea. I am working on BT #538 to install the latest latex2html
> on another computer so I have a backup. Once I am finished with that
> I can update the distros pages "how to" on the website. I do not
> think too many people have used the AppImage's yet but I believe that
> MatN uses it and has reported no problems.
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 7:15 AM Andrea paz via Cin <
> cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if it's time to put appimage as the main
> > installation
> > method of CinGG, highlighting it in the website and the manual. The
> > binaries remain working but not updated. What do you guys think?
More information about the Cin