[Cin] flac 1.4.0

Andrew Randrianasulu randrianasulu at gmail.com
Sat Sep 17 20:01:44 CEST 2022


сб, 17 сент. 2022 г., 20:50 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:

> It looks like Andrea got good results  -- will wait until Monday to see if
> he thinks Flac 1.4.0 should go in.
> Meanwhile, I decided to do a much bigger test and here are the results:
>
> Old:     671435 frames in 274.260 secs / 2448.170 fps / Size=2834313874
> New:   671435 frames in 244.648 secs / 2744.494 fps  / Size=2786770407
> (Compression=0)
> New:   671435 frames in 354.841 secs / 1892.214 fps  / Size=2400810590
> (Compression=5)
>
> Would it not be better to put the default compression level at 0?  That
> would be the most consistent with the old version in speed and in size.  I
> do not think it is a good idea to change what the user is used to seeing --
> especially since the speed of the new version is better than the old once
> Andrew's patches are applied.  What do you think?
>


well, it seems speed/size in this case depend on content (what exactly we
compress), so lets wait for more tests from Andrea.

But at very least this parameter how configurable :-)

>
>
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 2:09 AM Andrea paz <gamberucci.andrea at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here are the results with all patches (I did not install doxygen):
>>
>> ** rendered 9063 frames in 2.455 secs, 3691.650 fps
>>
>> ** rendered 9063 frames in 2.284 secs, 3968.039 fps
>>
>> ** rendered 9063 frames in 3.117 secs, 2907.603 fps
>>
>> NB: the value of "compression_level" remains as previously set, it
>> does not change to the default automatically.
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20220917/1c4d58f5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cin mailing list