[Cin] Current heap of patches

[Andrew Randrianasulu]

вт, 29 авг. 2023 г., 06:23 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:

>
>> To be honest I hope libtiff build patches, ffmpeg-5.1.patch999 and ffmpeg
>> filters build fix for new ffmpeg will find their way in, because they fix
>> build breakage on Andrea's updated Arch.
>>
> Andrew, I need clarification.  What do you mean by the above "ffmpeg
> filters build fix for new ffmpeg"?  are you referring to
> 0002-Fix-build-in-pluginfclient.C-with-ffmpeg-6.0.patch ?
>

yes, I tried to make it work for both 5.1 and 6.0+


I have done a basic look at it and applied it to current ffmpeg-5.1
> already rather than 6.0.  Is that OK? as it "looks" acceptable to me.
>

As long as ffmpeg's audio filters work as before.... I only tested one!


> Still checking libtiff build patches.
>
> My "early quit from filetiff/filetga/filepng" patches might wait for more
>> testing (notably I hope they does not leak file descriptors or such, I only
>> tested on short, less than minute video).
>>
>> On further plans ... May be if ffmpeg 6.1 fails to materialize in first
>> half of september we will go with 6.0, preparing new plugin info and such?
>> So far ffmpeg.git was  not worse than 5.1 for me but seeking in mkv might
>> be different (it was different in MPlayer).
>>
>> Other updates might include x265 git (aarch64 stuff, build warning with
>> new nasm fixed), libjpeg-turbo 3.0.0/3.0.1, libtiff 4.5.1, removal of
>> openjpeg (ffmpeg.git removed support for it, and we does not use it
>> directly), adding lcms2 lib so ffmpeg can use it ...
>>
>> Also, I wonder if optipng run over our icons (or even pngquant, at least
>> on those we have svg source for) might be useful? Standard set of icons
>> weight nearly 8mb and stuffed directly into executable ....
>>
>> But this is just reminder about ideas I have, my vision and visual taste
>> not good enough for saying definitively about icon quality before/after.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 11:23 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <
>>> randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> f_acontrast seems to work on 5.1 with those patches too ...
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20230829/e25f4651/attachment.htm>