[Cin] Cinelerra-GG packages build farm

[Andrew Randrianasulu]

сб, 2 дек. 2023 г., 10:20 Андрей Спицын <spitsyn.andrey at gmail.com>:

> Hello Phyllis, Terje and Andrew
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> I have some experience with rpm-based systems. Why does dnf select the
> i686 architecture in the first place? On Debian based systems, apt selects
> the original architecture of the system by default.
>
> Andrew, I think the spec file should be architecture agnostic. Otherwise
> I'll have to patch it when I add i686 or arm64 builder.
>

may be ?_isa macro from rpm 4.6.0 can help?

https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/arch_dependencies.html

==== copy ====

ISA Dependencies

In rpm 4.6.0, the concept of ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) was
introduced to permit differentiating between 32- and 64-bit versions
without resorting to file dependencies on obscure and/or library-version
dependent paths. To declare a dependency on a package name architecture
specific, append %{?_isa} to the dependency name, eg

Requires: libbar-devel%{?_isa} >= 2.2

This will expand to libbar-devel(archfamily-bitness) depending on the build
target architecture, for example a native build on x86_64 would give

Requires: libbar-devel(x86-64) >= 2.2

but with –target i386 (or i586, i686 etc) it would become

Requires: libbar-devel(x86-32) >= 2.2

Note that this requires all the involved packages must have been built with
rpm >= 4.6.0, older versions do not add the necessary name(isa) provides to
packages.
== copy end ===
it seems that rpm 4.6.0 surfaced in 2009 ...

https://lwn.net/Articles/318586/





> Best regards,
> Andrey
>
> сб, 2 дек. 2023 г., 03:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin <
> cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org>:
>
>> Thanks Terje !  works much better now once I installed the x86_64
>> version, which should have been automatic in the first place.
>> Sorry Andrey for my dumb mistake -- it installed from the build farm and
>> works just fine -- I just wanted to test it.
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:54 PM Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Terje, nice catch and definitely wrong BUT can not understand why that
>>> happened?!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 4:40 PM Terje J. Hanssen via Cin <
>>> cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Phyllis,
>>>>
>>>> Maybe a stupid question, but as you have suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686
>>>> installed:
>>>> Is this 32bit lib just just added to 64bit or a base 32bit (i686)
>>>> Fedora OS?
>>>>
>>>> Terje
>>>>
>>>> Den 01.12.2023 23:46, skrev Phyllis Smith via Cin:
>>>>
>>>> Andrey, this is NOT Important as I was just playing around with a newly
>>>> installed Fedora 38, but here is what went wrong.
>>>>
>>>> # rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
>>>> error: Failed dependencies:
>>>> libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
>>>> # dnf install libsuil-0.so.0
>>>> ...
>>>> Installed:
>>>>   suil-0.10.18-1.fc38.i686
>>>> ...
>>>> # rpm -i cinelerra-5.1-20231201.fc38.x86_64.rpm
>>>> error: Failed dependencies:
>>>> libsuil-0.so.0()(64bit) is needed by cinelerra-5.1-20231201.x86_64
>>>>
>>>> I will see if I can find the exact older version needed and install it
>>>> instead.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 5:14 AM Андрей Спицын <spitsyn.andrey at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Phyllis and everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a build farm for cinelerra deb and rpm packages. Although
>>>>> it is at an early stage of development, it can build packages on every git
>>>>> change in the main repo. Feel free to use these packages at
>>>>> https://github.com/einhander/cin-gg-packages/releases. Note that
>>>>> releases correspond to a build date, not a git commit date.
>>>>> Current build hosts are debian 12 and alma linux 8. I'm open to
>>>>> suggestions for a new distro and packages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Andrey Spitsyn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cin mailing list
>>>> Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org
>>>> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
>>>>
>>> --
>> Cin mailing list
>> Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org
>> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20231202/318a8ed8/attachment-0001.htm>