[Cin] Tested vaapi hwaccel presets

[Phyllis Smith]

Well, yes, BUT the point is people have procedures set up to build this
automatically for years and now all of a sudden they will have to install
more software.  Probably not a good idea.

On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 4:40 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> вт, 3 дек. 2024 г., 02:36 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Unfortunately, it won't even build when I add:   --with-onevpl    on the
>> configure line:
>> configure: error: requires onevpl support.
>> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found.  Stop.
>>
>> This is my 6 year old AMD laptop.
>>
>
> you need to install
>
> https://github.com/intel/libvpl
>
> I used 2.13 for my dummy tests, but something down to 2.6 (I think) should
> work, at least as build requirement.
>
>
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 4:01 PM Terje J. Hanssen <terjejhanssen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Den 02.12.2024 23:32, skrev Phyllis Smith:
>>>
>>> Adding OneVPL by default, which only works on the latest Intel computers
>>> and not on older ones or AMD, would not be a good idea; especially not for
>>> the RPM packaging.  That is my opinion based on our attempt to keep CinGG
>>> generically usable on older computers and even 32-bit systems.
>>>
>>>
>>> I didn't think "onevpl on" would prohibit other than Intel hardware to
>>> work as else, and that hwaccell work or not, dependent of the platform
>>> support.
>>> Actually my thought was to test what legacy Intel hardware are good for.
>>> Is possibly a Cingg user-switch possible instead?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have yet to go through the last 5 attachment patches that Andrew
>>> graciously put all in one place for viability on all systems.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2024 at 2:01 PM Terje J. Hanssen <terjejhanssen at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Den 30.11.2024 01:03, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> сб, 30 нояб. 2024 г., 01:07 Phyllis Smith via Cin <
>>>> cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org>:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew, should these and the QSV presets be checked into GIT now that
>>>>> Terje has tested them on his specific hardware?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yes, but 10bit ones require patch for themselves and recent one
>>>> removing addition of ildct flag for some qsv encoders ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "Exp: do not set ildct flag for qsv_av1/h264/vp9"
>>>> 0001-yet-another-10bit-attempt.patch
>>>> 0002-Hopefully-wire-up-various-cin_pix_fmt-for-vaapi-enco.patch
>>>>
>>>> re-attached so you do not need to hunt them in mailthreads ....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is the onevpl patch already included in the buildsystem?
>>>> It was said it was "default to off", so I wonder if it will be
>>>> available or "on" in the upcoming rpm?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I also have mediacodec/termux related profiles, and one hackfix for
>>>> mjpegtools failing to build here on clang.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> P.S. There will not be new Appimages created at the end of this month,
>>>>> but will wait until December.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 3:52 PM Terje J. Hanssen <
>>>>> terjejhanssen at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached tested vaapi hwaccel presets as gzip'd tar file
>>>>>>
>>>>>> av1_vaapi_10b420.mp4
>>>>>> av1_vaapi_10b420.webm
>>>>>> av1_vaapi_8b420.mp4
>>>>>> av1_vaapi_8b420.webm
>>>>>> h264_vaapi_8b420.mp4
>>>>>> hevc_vaapi_10b420.mp4
>>>>>> hevc_vaapi_10b422.mp4
>>>>>> hevc_vaapi_8b420.mp4
>>>>>> vp9_vaapi_10b420.mp4
>>>>>> vp9_vaapi_10b420.webm
>>>>>> vp9_vaapi_8b420.mp4
>>>>>> vp9_vaapi_8b420.webm
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Cin mailing list
>>>>> Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org
>>>>> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20241202/af987145/attachment-0001.htm>