[Cin] current set of my patches

Phyllis Smith phylsmith2017 at gmail.com
Sat Jan 13 19:36:55 CET 2024


Correction - on at least 1 file, when "guessed" was present, "codec" was
not but "container" was.  So still, "guessed" is redundant and looks icky.

On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 11:33 AM Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> just use normally, look at asset info -> details for ffmpeg decoded assets
>> from time to time ( I think reduction factor of 1024*1024 was a bit too
>> big, so some display aspect ratios in newly added lines  will look
>> unusually big ?)
>>
> Have tested at least 60 files -- these are from my set of test files so
> have been around awhile so are older files.
>
> Observations:
> 1) about "some display aspect ratios ... will look unusually big" - I did
> not see this as unusual AND whenever the display aspect ratio was big, it
> perfectly matched the results given by ffprobe outside CinGG.
> 2) "guessed" seemed to always match "codec"  (although guessed would take
> the equivalent number of, for example, 72x72 as also shown by ffprobe and
> make it 1:1) AND whenever "guessed" was present, "codec" was too.
>
> So, could we eliminate "guessed" since it was the initial setting before
> "codec" and "container" were added as correct instead of just a guess?
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20240113/32c92fbf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cin mailing list