[Cin] Build Cingg-with-system-FFmpeg won't startup after upgrade to ffmpeg-7-7.1

Andrew Randrianasulu randrianasulu at gmail.com
Wed Oct 23 17:45:17 CEST 2024


ср, 23 окт. 2024 г., 18:23 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:

> may be we better to skip 7.1 completely?
>
> This is disturbing. Usually if something is not working in one version, it
> is still carried to the next.
>

I crossposted my frustration with current situation (when ffmpeg team
one-sidely breaks not just us but everyone downstream) earlier this day.

Of course team of professional developers will change their part (breaking
things) much faster and effortlessly than I ever can hope to repair them.

Because ffmpeg apparently set to 2-3 release per year, with unknown amount
of breakage each time ...I  am not really eager to fix something twice. yuv
range fix still not agreed upon, as far as I can, may be it will end up as
rework and not just fix. I amnot sure if 7.1 makes much sense for us in
itself?

Of course breakage that come in 7.2/8.0 might be so big that I'll prefer to
fix  7.1 instead.

My main worry that even outside ff-scale filter and profile vs vprofile
change something broke with some vaapi/qsv profiles, and it might be harder
to track down.

Right now 7.1 *builds* fine if you add renamed patch10 at least, but on
runtime ..... we have all those errors Terje reported.



> ...
> Snip, Snip, Snip!
>
> Doesn't this correspond to what we previously also discussed for ffmpeg
>>> 7.0.2?
>>>
>>
>> ffmpeg as cli does its own option processing, as far as I understand.
>>
>> Using av_dict_* functions in c++ code was working with libav*/ffmpeg libs
>> up to 7.0
>> but evidently not after..
>>
>> I'll look into what ffmpeg cli does now, but if more changes in pipeline
>> may be we better to skip 7.1 completely?
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20241023/13d6d1b9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Cin mailing list