<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<font face="Times New Roman">I did some tests here (in RGBA-8bit)
with Reroute, and Alpha Channel. It seems to work correctly. It is
time consuming, for me, to post here the screencast/screenshot of
the tests, but if you think it can be useful tell me.<br>
It may be (surely) that Cin-CV and Cin-GG work slightly
differently. I remember that, when you are using Title effect,
the black colour is meant to be the alpha channel (more or less).<br>
It may be that not everything Cin-CV is able to do can be
reproduced in Cin-GG,... and vice versa.<br>
<br>
IgorBeg <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</font>Il 26/09/2022 18:20, Phyllis Smith via Cin ha scritto:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAOckJE2koDbDOOP_S0+B=t9PqVXgaVg=Pw97PktYrimGmbkUNA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="font-size: small;" class="gmail_default">You can
perform this convoluted method OR "just use a simple Outline
font" which can be freely downloaded.<br>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px
0px 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,
204); padding-left: 1ex;"> Already with the default
overlay<br>
(Normal) the result is not exactly the same as in
the tutorial. For<br>
example, the outline of the letters is all white
while in the tutorial<br>
there are plays of light and shadows that make it
three-dimensional.<br>
But the worst comes when I set the center track to
"Multiply": a<br>
completely wrong color comes out!<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div dir="auto"> But I have growing suspection we really do
some calculations differently, may be in more
widespread/standard way but not like original Cin worked.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size: small;">Agreed.
CinGG does some things differently as well as
calculations. That does not make them wrong.</span> </div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>