<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Den 11.12.2022 16:53, skrev Terje J.
Hanssen:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:8cee5b16-25e5-1ed5-83e6-36ad97eb6191@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">UDF is told to have
replaced ISO for optical CD/DVD/BD discs.<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://askanydifference.com/difference-between-udf-and-iso-with-table/"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://askanydifference.com/difference-between-udf-and-iso-with-table/</a><br>
<br>
<br>
I wonder if someone can clarify if UDF version 2.5 or higher
really is required for creating and burning Blu-ray video to
VBD-discs.<br>
<br>
I've got this impression earlier, i.e for K3b here, which still
seems to be much the case on Linux:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257602</a><br>
<br>
I've seen there could be UDF 2.5 on Ubuntu and possibly with
tsMuxer(?)<br>
Bt in my case on Leap 15.4, and even on Tumbleweed, the latest
available udf package versions are 2.1 and 2.3:<br>
<br>
S | Name | Type | Version | Arch | Repository<br>
---+----------+-------+-----------------+--------+----------------<br>
i+ | libudf0 | pakke | 2.1.0-1.27 | x86_64 | Main
Repository<br>
i+ | udftools | pakke | 2.3-lp154.321.3 | x86_64 | 15.4<br>
<br>
<br>
udftools 2.3 is even an experimental package from OBS with
content<br>
<br>
/usr/bin/udfinfo <br>
/usr/bin/wrudf <br>
/usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-pktsetup.rules <br>
/usr/sbin/mkfs.udf <br>
/usr/sbin/mkudffs <br>
/usr/sbin/pktcdvd-check <br>
/usr/sbin/pktsetup <br>
/usr/sbin/udflabel <br>
<br>
<br>
So what happends and decide the udf file system version when
using mkudffs, bdwrite and dd or K3b lastly for burning? <br>
when I let K3b autodect the image (because there are no
selection for UDF), it actually shows "ISO 9660" while burning.
<br>
And the result has prooved to be playable Blu-ray discs in hw
player.<br>
</font> </blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<font face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">First, to correct one
possibly confusing typo above: VBD-discs should be Blu-ray video
discs<br>
<br>
To add An extract from udfinfo for one of my burned BD-RE dscs:<br>
<br>
udfinfo /dev/sr0 | grep udf<br>
udfinfo: Warning: Device '/dev/sr0' is busy, udfinfo may report
bogus information<br>
udfinfo: Warning: Second and third Anchor Volume Descriptor
Pointer not found<br>
udfinfo: Warning: Logical Volume is in inconsistent state<br>
appid=*Linux mkudffs 2.3<br>
udfrev=2.01<br>
udfwriterev=2.01<br>
<br>
</font><br>
</body>
</html>