<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Den 12.07.2024 01:02, skrev Phyllis
Smith:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOckJE2E_k4UtrNODT++4iM2BMKqBAkNZrN4QJXkFZUSOUaAkw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Catching up
on this thread with some trivial commentary on my part.<br>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div> I looked into which pixel formats current ffmpeg-7
encoders in question do support as follows:<span
class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> "QUOTE
from Terje"</span><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">The
"pixel formats" that CinGG supports with whatever ffmpeg
version is currently being used, is shown in the Render
Menu when you click on the Video wrench. There is a box
labeled "Pixels" and when you click on the down arrow next
to the box, it displays all of the supported formats so
you do not have to reference the ffmpeg documentation
externally.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thank you, that was clarifying using CinGG, and I did some browsing
tests, additional selected container format and compression (?)<br>
It's late, so please excuse and correct me if I did miss something
during a quick comparison with my last post and could not see these
encoders<br>
<blockquote>av1_nvenc, av1_qsv, av1_amf, <font
face="Courier New, Courier, monospace">mpeg2_qsv</font>
(hwaccel) and cfhd<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOckJE2E_k4UtrNODT++4iM2BMKqBAkNZrN4QJXkFZUSOUaAkw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>
So we keep the 8-bit because it is more efficient (1 word
vs 2 words)?<span class="gmail_default"
style="font-size:small"> </span>Are there other
reasons? Wouldn't it be less confusing to just have<span
class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> </span>the
multibit?<span class="gmail_default"
style="font-size:small"> "QUOTE from Andrea"<br>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">As
long as we have the capability to support older operating
systems, smaller computers, 32-bit, and older cameras,
there does not seem to be any reason to eliminate the
non-multibit version. Now there is still a choice and
there may be reasons to not just have the multibit version
from what I read based on the multibit taking more CPU (I
have not tested this). It does not seem confusing to me
-- probably newer users with newer systems will
automatically pick the multibit version.</span></div>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</span></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">less
work for both developers and users "QUOTE from Terje"<br>
</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>
<span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Because
I sometimes do multiple builds in a single session, the
extra time it takes to compile the multibit version is
detrimental for me. On the other hand, creating a single
AppImage multibit version of the generally newer operating
system is only done by me once a month or less and no work
at all. BTW, the
CinGG-20240630-x86_64-older-distros-multibit.AppImage
was just a request from a Red Hat user (like Fedora) who
wanted Intel graphics capability that I just happened to
have set up. I am not sure if it is much used. And I do
not see any additional work needed by users -- they should
just pick that single multibit version.<br>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Ok, no extra maintaining job. I have up to now installed both
versions of the belief that only Multibit did support 10bit or
higher color depth (esp. x265).<br>
<br>
So to clarify further, is also einander's CinGG package version (rpm
for me) identical with the Multibit version (earlier Cinx)?<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOckJE2E_k4UtrNODT++4iM2BMKqBAkNZrN4QJXkFZUSOUaAkw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span
class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">
It would also be useful with an updated list over
supported formats, codecs and bit-rates, based on
CinGG's internal ffmpeg engine.
Some codecs like Cineform is not mentioned in the
current manual. "QUOTE Terje"</span></blockquote>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Accuracy
and being up to date on ffmpeg documentation is really
best done by their team. Those using AppImage may not
have ffmpeg actually installed on their computer, but
all of the ffmpeg documentation is readily available on
the internet. Duplication is not a good idea as it may
not get updated.</span></div>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</span></div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"></span>
CineformHD is only mentioned in the "Overview on Formats
and Codecs"<span class="gmail_default"
style="font-size:small"> </span>appendix<span
class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"> "QUOTE
Andrea"</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">There
is an index entry in the Manual of "codec". Maybe
adding "Overview on Formats and Codecs" could be another
index?</span></div>
</div>
<div><span class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small"><br>
</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>