<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Den 07.01.2025 15:48, skrev Phyllis
Smith:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOckJE3Umo59hcwpqVVJgauBCc6LR+5sjLfV6vhS6ti9sDZzdg@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:small">Slower
AppImage is to be expected, but still disappointing. Bottom
line is that users who can take advantage of Andrey's RPMs
should always do so. Besides being faster, it provides more
capabilities and opportunity to make some minor side changes.
Thank you, Terje, for doing the tests and passing along this
information.<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Terje J. Hanssen via Cin <<a
href="mailto:cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I
did a few hevc and av1 OSV render tests using the latest RPM
w/oneVPL <br>
on Leap, to compare it with my own AppImage.<br>
To get the AppImage from Slowroll to run om Leap, I had to
add-install a <br>
newer version libFLAC12.<br>
<br>
The machine is AlderLake w/Arc A750 gpu<br>
The OS root drive is on a std SATA disc, while the video files
are <br>
read/written to a fast M.2 disc.<br>
<br>
Results:<br>
<br>
hevc_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 19.255 secs, 310.153 fps (RPM)<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 23.798 secs, 250.945 fps (AppImage)<br>
<br>
av1_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 18.612 secs, 320.868 fps (RPM)<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.470 secs, 278.156 fps (AppImage)<br>
<br>
In average rendering is ca. 20% faster with the RPM.<br>
I did also additional test with the AppImage on Slowroll and
got a bit <br>
faster rendering, but not so fast as with RPM on Leap.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
==========================<br>
<br>
Not especially news or differently, but as I also have supplemented
my AppImages and native builds tests on Slowroll, I add them here.
My conclusion is that the package (RPM) build (due to most
dynamically linked libs I guess?) still stands as fastest, while the
AppImages supply with benefit of portability (cross Linux
distributions).<br>
<br>
<br>
On Slowroll (root and video on the M.2 NVMe SSD)<br>
------------------<br>
<br>
CinGG-20241120-x86_64.AppImage<br>
<br>
hevc_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 20.574 secs, 290.269 fps<br>
<br>
av1_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.612 secs, 276.328 fps<br>
-------------<br>
<br>
CinGG_use_system_ffmpeg-71_20241020-x86_64.AppImage<br>
<br>
hevc_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.065 secs, 283.503 fps<br>
<br>
av1_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.033 secs, 283.935 fps<br>
-------------------------<br>
<br>
Native built with Cingg's internal ffmpeg 7.0<br>
bin/cin<br>
Cinelerra Infinity - built: Nov 20 2024 22:06:05<br>
<br>
hevc_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.299 secs, 280.389 fps<br>
<br>
av1_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.313 secs, 280.205 fps<br>
---------------------------------<br>
<br>
Native built with dynamic linked system ffmpeg 7.1<br>
<br>
/Cin/bin_use_system_ffmpeg-71> bin/cin<br>
Cinelerra Infinity - built: Oct 20 2024 21:21:06<br>
<br>
hevc_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
Had to comment out<br>
# profile=main<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 20.988 secs, 284.544 fps<br>
<br>
av1_qsv_8b420.mp4<br>
Had to Set Format (hdv input) tff interlaced to Not interlaced<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 20.835 secs, 286.633 fps<br>
** rendered 5972 frames in 21.024 secs, 284.056 fps<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>