About the forum post: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-user-builds/#post-... You could try to create your own binary, each for your own distro, and then make it available. Is this feasible? I would need detailed instructions, because I don't know how to do it!
This might be a good solution to create tar files which is easy to do and easy to install for the user. I think that creating packages is not that difficult either but I do not know for sure. With few changes being implemented, making new builds semi-annually would most likely be sufficient. I am still trying to understand appimage and flatpak usage but as far as I can tell, it only makes it easier for the user. The developer/programmer still has to create the runtime. On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:56 AM Andrea paz via Cin < [email protected]> wrote:
About the forum post:
https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-user-builds/#post-...
You could try to create your own binary, each for your own distro, and then make it available. Is this feasible? I would need detailed instructions, because I don't know how to do it! -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
I wish I had knowledge to help you with this issue. The only thing I know of Flatpak is that all users use the same build independent of the Linux distribution they use. We should make a call on github to see if a programmer can guide us and help us with this issue. El martes, 5 de enero de 2021, Phyllis Smith via Cin < [email protected]> escribió:
This might be a good solution to create tar files which is easy to do and easy to install for the user. I think that creating packages is not that difficult either but I do not know for sure. With few changes being implemented, making new builds semi-annually would most likely be sufficient.
I am still trying to understand appimage and flatpak usage but as far as I can tell, it only makes it easier for the user. The developer/programmer still has to create the runtime.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:56 AM Andrea paz via Cin < [email protected]> wrote:
About the forum post: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-us er-builds/#post-1468
You could try to create your own binary, each for your own distro, and then make it available. Is this feasible? I would need detailed instructions, because I don't know how to do it! -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
I cannot help, but introduced a short inquiry about Appimage in a previous thread https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2019-April/000485.html Terje J. Hanssen Den 05.01.2021 18:10, skrev Rafa Mar Multimedia en Gnu\Linux via Cin:
I wish I had knowledge to help you with this issue. The only thing I know of Flatpak is that all users use the same build independent of the Linux distribution they use. We should make a call on github to see if a programmer can guide us and help us with this issue.
El martes, 5 de enero de 2021, Phyllis Smith via Cin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> escribió:
This might be a good solution to create tar files which is easy to do and easy to install for the user. I think that creating packages is not that difficult either but I do not know for sure. With few changes being implemented, making new builds semi-annually would most likely be sufficient.
I am still trying to understand appimage and flatpak usage but as far as I can tell, it only makes it easier for the user. The developer/programmer still has to create the runtime.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:56 AM Andrea paz via Cin <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
About the forum post: https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-user-builds/#post-... <https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-user-builds/#post-1468>
You could try to create your own binary, each for your own distro, and then make it available. Is this feasible? I would need detailed instructions, because I don't know how to do it! -- Cin mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 09:01:23 -0700 Phyllis Smith via Cin <[email protected]> wrote:
This might be a good solution to create tar files which is easy to do and easy to install for the user. I think that creating packages is not that difficult either but I do not know for sure. With few changes being implemented, making new builds semi-annually would most likely be sufficient.
I am still trying to understand appimage and flatpak usage but as far as I can tell, it only makes it easier for the user. The developer/programmer still has to create the runtime.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 12:56 AM Andrea paz via Cin < [email protected]> wrote:
About the forum post:
https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/forum/everything-else/single-user-builds/#post-...
You could try to create your own binary, each for your own distro, and then make it available. Is this feasible? I would need detailed instructions, because I don't know how to do it! -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
AppImage will be far smaller than a flatpack. I use AppImages of Musescore, FreeCad, texstudio, balenaetcher. I have experimentally built a Cin-GG AppImage in 2019. https://www.cinelerra-gg.org/bugtracker/view.php?id=261 It more or less ran. To do it properly, it probably requires to define a new "platform" AppImage, to make sure all required libraries are taken into the build. I still have the templates I used then, if anyone who can build a binary want to try it let me know, because although the building tool will pull in any missing libraries, those are the ones of the building platform. MatN
participants (5)
-
Andrea paz -
MatN -
Phyllis Smith -
Rafa Mar Multimedia en Gnu\Linux -
Terje J. Hanssen