[Cin] Bump Autos + other checked into GIT
Rafa Mar Multimedia en Gnu\Linux
rafamar.mm.ig at gmail.com
Fri Aug 28 00:32:22 CEST 2020
I've tried the basics and it has improved a lot.
I see that if I add a clip on a track with modified speed it still gives
the wrong result. But knowing that this is so is enough. I hate to give
these concerns to the developers of Cinelerra.
El jue., 27 ago. 2020 a las 19:04, Phyllis Smith via Cin (<
cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org>) escribió:
> Sorry for a late reply but there is now a static tar test build for Mint
> 19.3 at:
>> But using my test with Speed=2 the edits on the right are shrunk.
> We see the error and GG has reproduced it but has not been able to discern
> the problem to fix it. It is strange but hopefully more debugging will
> lead to a solution.
>> 1- what happens if there are keyframes within the bump interval? It
>> seems to me that they become bump keyframes too, so the interval
>> designed by us is reduced to several intervals between close autos.
> That is correct.
>> 2- When you set the right edge keyframe (edge and span), you also
>> change the left edge keyframe. And vice versa. In my opinion it would
>> be better to make them independent
> Turn off *span* and you should be able to do that (I have not had a
> chance to test myself).
>> 3- The autos handlers give boredom, confuse the curve if there are
>> other keyframes and are unusable to make changes to the autos (which
>> can only be done with sliders). Is it possible to delete them or at
>> least not see them?
> I agree and am still trying to convince GG to turn them off as they just
> confuse me.
> Cin mailing list
> Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cin