[Cin] Updated DNxHD profile

[Andrew Randrianasulu]

В сообщении от Sunday 22 November 2020 11:44:46 Andrea paz via Cin написал(а):
> With the new preset the 18th line is now complete. But I knew from the
> Avid white paper that there are 64 presets in all. How did you make
> your list?

I just deleted few similar lines while adding their bitrate like 110,120 Mbps
to first remaining line in a group -- because those just comments/hints 
for human user it should work ....

> 
> I propose to split dnxhd.qt into several separate presets each
> containing a series of bit rates, from the largest to the smallest.
> for example (list from:
> https://www.avid.com/de/~/media/avid/files/whitepaper-pdf/dnxhd.pdf?la=en):
> 
> DNxHD_720p_23.976.pro
> containing:
> -1280;4:2:2;10-bit;23.976;92mbps
> -1280;4:2:2;8-bit;23.976;92mbps
> -1280;4:2:2;8-bit;23.976;60mbps
> -1280;4:2:2;8-bit;23.976;43mbps
> 
> ...
> ...
> 
> DNxHD_1080p_29.97.pro
> containing:
> -1920;4:4:4;10-bit;29.976;440mbps
> -1920;4:2:2;10-bit;29.976;220mbps
> -1920;4:2:2;8-bit;29.976;220mbps
> -1920;4:2:2;8-bit;29.976;145mbps
> -1920;4:2:2;8-bit;29.976;100mbps
> -1920;4:2:2;8-bit;29.976;45mbps
> 
> 
> And so on. In all there are 14 presets each containing 4 to 6 specific
> bit rates.
> In this way a user would have a tidier, clearer and more complete view
> without having to manually configure all 64 specifications.
> 
> [However I return to say that DNxHD has too rigid, uncomfortable and
> confusing specifications. Much better to use DNxHR]
> 
> I did a similar thing for the ProRes, which I attach: I divided the 3
> current presets into 6 presets that do not need manual configuration.

Okk, will try to do the same with DNxHD, but a bit later

> The problem is the same I had for DNxHR: it offers me all the options
> for the pixel_format but only the right one works; the others lead to
> error. I guess doing the job of making only the right pix_fmt appear
> then it would work without problems as it did for DNxHR (except for
> me!).

 .....
>