[Cin] in/out point selected plugin attach fix?

[Andrew Randrianasulu]

On Saturday, August 7, 2021, Igor BEGHETTO via Cin <
cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org> wrote:

> Hi Andrew_R,
> I have little time to reply here now, but could you read the good Manual,
> section 5.2.1  (https://cinelerra-gg.org/download/CinelerraGG_Manual.pdf)
> before make patches and create an other item for Preferences, please?


I sure will re-read this section, thanks!

just I thought documentation always can be changed/extended if new idea how
to get it work both ways can be found.

making small changes in codebase is good for my practice, and hopefully
recording my mistakes publically will be useful for those who might want to
make different changes in CinGG in future (or even for future myself)

sorry for surprizing amount of mails on every little subject - have enough
time for life!


> A lot of discussion was made time ago about. I think it is better to speak
> and then, eventually, make a patch, if possible.
> Sorry but I am ignorant in Linux, and I don't understand anything about
> patches. And thanks for your effort.
> May be tomorrow (sunday) I try to explain better. Thanks.
>
> IgorBeg
>
> Il 07/08/2021 19:39, Andrew Randrianasulu via Cin ha scritto:
>
>>
>>
>> On Saturday, August 7, 2021, Andrew Randrianasulu <
>> randrianasulu at gmail.com <mailto:randrianasulu at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>     On Saturday, August 7, 2021, Andrew Randrianasulu
>>     <randrianasulu at gmail.com <mailto:randrianasulu at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         On Saturday, August 7, 2021, Andrea paz
>>         <gamberucci.andrea at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:gamberucci.andrea at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>             I think the best course of action, in line with BT#577, is
>>             to use
>>             patches 1 and 2, which work fine, and not use 3 and 0004.
>>             I remember
>>             it being a long discussion to get that result and I
>>             wouldn't want to
>>             start all over again.
>>
>>
>>         In theory I can try to implement some kind of checkbox/toggle
>>         between those two modes (named like 'respect armed state in
>>         gang modes'), but for now may be patch listing in manul ('if
>>         you want to change default behavior just change those lines,
>>         like shown here') will be enough..?
>>
>>
>>     i found mail list discussion, thing is it was initially about
>>     _play_ feature, not disarm feature (i see arm/disarm as way to
>>     protect tracks from unwanted change..)
>>
>>     src:
>>     https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2020-October/002514.html
>>     <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/2020-October/
>> 002514.html>
>>
>>     again, I wonder why it was noted by Phyllis "but making it a
>>     Preference is not
>>     a good idea.". Just because our Preferences a bit crowded already?
>>
>>
>>
>> anyway, just as with rewind speed I created local variable controlling
>> this behavior, and stored it into Cinelerra_rc (so you can edit it like you
>> want w/o recompilation)
>>
>> see patch 0005
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>              Phyllis, what do you think?
>>
>> --
> Cin mailing list
> Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org
> https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20210808/daad88dc/attachment-0001.htm>