[Cin] oh, my fix for nested edl undo crash regressed video!
phylsmith2017 at gmail.com
Mon Dec 26 20:54:34 CET 2022
I will test that but I am not very good at testing and was hoping from
feedback from someone who is better at it. Will start testing that in
about 30 minutes.
On Mon, Dec 26, 2022 at 12:17 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <
randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
> вс, 20 нояб. 2022 г., 01:23 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:
>> I created an AppImage that contains the BT #558 bug fix (0x00 vs. 0xff)
>> AND with these 2 Experimental patches in to fix "nested edl undo crash" so
>> you could test if you find the time. The fix for 558 is the most important
>> though and you already built that. It is at:
>> Locking and unlocking are extremely sensitive and can cause all kinds of
>> weird crashes so I guess that is why the patch is called EXPERIMENTAL. But
>> could definitely be the missing part and fix the problem.
> I recompiled cingg on my Slackware without those two patches and sadly
> crash on nested edl load/undo still around :(
> Phyllis, can you just add part with checking existence of edl, and may be
> leave locking changes out for now? ( I thought we should unlock in same
> function if we exit from it but may be I am wrong ...)
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 6:50 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <
>> randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
>>> От: Андрей Рандрианасулу <randrik at mail.ru>
>>> Date: пн, 14 нояб. 2022 г., 04:37
>>> Subject: oh, my fix for nested edl undo crash regressed video!
>>> To: randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com>
>>> better (?) fix (tested with video this time)
>>> Андрей Рандрианасулу
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Cin