[Cin] fileexr/fileppm direct copy support
Phyllis Smith
phylsmith2017 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 29 20:01:00 CEST 2022
** rendered 2712 frames in 0.348 secs, 7793.103 fps
** rendered 2712 frames in 20.465 secs, 132.519 fps
On Sat, Oct 29, 2022 at 9:22 AM Andrea paz <gamberucci.andrea at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks Phyllis; I finally saw some difference:
>
> AppImage (no patch)
>
> render exr to exr: 176 sec, 19.491 fps
> render exr +plugin to exr: 183 sec, 18.717 fps
>
>
> Build (patch)
>
> render exr to exr: 172 sec, 19.970 fps
> render exr +plugin to exr: 173 sec, 19.8 fps
>
Not sure you are actually using Exr Sequence for the whole Project instead
of 1 single frame ? Or maybe Arch just handles things much differently.
Because there is not much variation on the speedup shown in your results.
For a 1 1/2 minute video, this is what I am getting:
*With patch* ** rendered 2712 frames in 0.348 secs, *7793.103 fps*
No patch ** rendered 2712 frames in 20.465 secs, *132.519 fps*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20221029/b1e6858d/attachment.htm>
More information about the Cin
mailing list