[Cin] Updated x265 snapshot from another thread

Phyllis Smith phylsmith2017 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 22 00:39:46 CET 2023

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 2:57 PM Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>

>> > I am trying to get 3 things all ready to test on other systems -- HDR,
>> libaom 3.8, and x265 -- so when I do, I will check to make sure multibit
>> compile works there too and make it a default.  Even if it takes longer for
>> me.  At one point I thought that if you rendered 8-bit on the multibit
>> x265, it would result in a bigger file than on the build non-multibit
>> system.  But I did a render test today and the files were exactly the same.
>> As you said, for me also the size of the files obtained with the
>> multibit and std versions is identical, as is the quality (to the eye)
>> of the video. The rendering speed is similar (just faster the std
>> version, but by a little). I would be for eliminating the std version
>> and using only the multibit, but on this point I would like to hear
>> everyone's opinion.
> Have not tested Debian 9.1 32-bit yet as am getting hung up on cause of
> error.
Now that I have tested multibit on Debian 9.1 32-bit, it too has an Error
in the log file, but seems to work anyway.  Error is:
cmake version 3.7.2 -- The C compiler identification is GNU 6.3.0 -- The
CXX compiler identification is GNU 6.3.0 -- Check for working C compiler:
/usr/bin/cc -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/cc -- works --
Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done --
/bin/sh: 1: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
Makefile:4: recipe for target 'all' failed
make[3]: [all] Error 2 (ignored)
make[3]: Leaving directory
touch /tmp/cinelerra-5.1-multibit/thirdparty/../thirdparty/build/x265.built
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20231221/2e72f5b7/attachment.htm>

More information about the Cin mailing list