[Cin] ffmpeg.git.patch10 started to fail ...

[Phyllis Smith]

OK, will work on getting the build to work as I mentioned earlier.  Next
time a new version of ffmpeg is released, we should probably upgrade and
not wait for the ".1" release which is what we have traditionally done.  If
we had known how long 6.1 was going to take, we would have used 6.0.

P.S. sorry for the late responses, I had the "handyman from hell"
"supposedly helping" me today with some physical yard work.


On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 7:22 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> ср, 4 окт. 2023 г., 03:55 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Started to test now, but my build failed so will probably not get it
>> going until tomorrow so will let you know then.
>>
>
>
> Thanks anyway , I hope need for this patch will go away as we update ffnv
> headers ....
>
> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-October/315211.html
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:39 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <
>> randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> this one apparently work better, in sense it compiles!
>>>
>>> can anyone check if cuda/nvenc hw acceleration still works with it?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 4:53 PM Andrew Randrianasulu
>>> <randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Because ffmpeg 6.1 still not branched I guess we better to look into
>>> relevant changes ... and adapt our patch.
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20231003/81f33a3d/attachment.htm>