[Cin] ffmpeg 6.1 probably delayed ?

[Andrew Randrianasulu]

вс, 29 окт. 2023 г., 18:38 Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com>:

>
>
> вс, 29 окт. 2023 г., 18:27 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2017 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Oh wow.  I guess I learned a lesson here -- don't wait for the point 1
>> (.1) release.  But still I am a little confused because I always thought
>> that the point 1 release was to fix flaws in the main release and not to
>> add new features.
>>
>
> I think ffmpeg uses x.x.1 and x.x.2 and so on as stable release .... so
> 5.0.1 or something will be stable, but without new features ....
>
> also, there is whole idea of LTS (long term support ) - depend on software
> it can be year (firefox, lol) to 3 years (blender) to some more years.
> FFmpeg tried to switch some releases to LTS model but .... :)
>
> actually, even 2.8 branch still get some fixes as far as I can see
>
> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release/2.8
>
> but we usually want something a bit newer :)
>
> Not really your fault, it was sort of announced to be in summer, but
> slipped away ....
>

oh, it was just branched few minutes ago!

https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release/6.1

>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 8:58 AM Andrew Randrianasulu <
>> randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-October/316264.html
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20231029/96d5943e/attachment.htm>