[Cin] Multitrack performance issues

[Stefan de Konink]

In my opinion, Cinelerra must be able to guess this itself.

Op 7/28/24 om 02:36 schreef Phyllis Smith:
> Stefan, in looking at the performance improvements you outlined below, 
> this one is really a HUGE improvement:
>    - modifying the "stacked video" (opacity 100%) to disable "Play 
> track" in the patchbay for the tracks that you do not need to see is the 
> winner.  I will add that to the Performance Tips section of the manual.  
> It is a great tip for any computer, not just the smaller ones.
> 
> But in my tests "for a disabled video effect, the CPU still runs", I did 
> not see this happening using the "top" command.  It seemed to make a 
> nice difference in lowering the cpu when I disabled the plugin.  Maybe 
> it is just the plugin I used? Burning Tv?  I will try some different 
> ones.  Also I did not verify that colourspace made no difference, but I 
> am sure you are right about that.
> 
> Thanks for this tip that we can pass along to other users via the 
> manual. ...Phyllis
> 
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 3:26 AM Stefan de Konink via Cin 
> <cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org <mailto:cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org>> wrote:
> 
>     I think have a significant opportunity to improve the Cinerella
>     performance, under normal editing conditions, by n_videotracks-fold. At
>     this point in time I notice that the CPU usage (decoding) for a section
>     where multiple tracks are stacked, but only the top one is actually on
>     screen (read opacity 100%) could be improved.
> 
>     I observe the following:
> 
>        - for a disabled video effect, the CPU still runs
>        - for stacked video, the CPU still runs for both videos
>        - the effect must be detached and the video below must have play
>     track
>          disabled to prevent the CPU to go from 20% to 150%
>        - this is independent of colourspace (RGB, RGBA, YUV or YUVA)
> 
>     -- 
>     Stefan
>     -- 
>     Cin mailing list
>     Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org <mailto:Cin at lists.cinelerra-gg.org>
>     https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
>     <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>
> 
> !DSPAM:1,66a59293103801231713492!

-- 
Stefan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_0xDA0A21EE7E3D2959.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 3074 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP public key
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20240728/3db367d3/attachment.skr>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20240728/3db367d3/attachment.asc>