BD creation aspect 16:9 fixes?
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created. It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
Tested with these 4 patches in with real Blu-ray device attached to a TV making 16x9 W new options of 25 and 29. All looks good but I have to look at patches more closely yet. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:22 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created.
It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
Andrew, I finally read through the patches and they look good within my limited knowledge. BUT, do you have any objection to moving the lines so that there are not confusing options where 720x576 and 720x480 repeat themselves -- i.e. the (w) does not show on the outer window and only after you highlight it? So the code from 0001-Add-SD-16-9-formats-to-BD-render.patch would look like below: { "720x576 25i", 720,576, 25., 0, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x576 25p*", 720,576, 25., 0, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED }, * { "720x576(w) 25i", 720,576, 25., 1, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x576(w) 25p*", 720,576, 25., 1, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED },* { "720x480 29.97i", 720,480, 29.97, 0, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x480 29.97p*", 720,480, 29.97, 0, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED }, { "720x480(w) 29.97i", 720,480, 29.97, 1, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x480(w) 29.97p*", 720,480, 29.97, 1, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED }, So as not to send bigger files to the Mailing List, I will send to Andrew, png shots. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:22 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created.
It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
чт, 18 янв. 2024 г., 22:07 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:
Andrew, I finally read through the patches and they look good within my limited knowledge. BUT, do you have any objection to moving the lines so that there are not confusing options where 720x576 and 720x480 repeat themselves -- i.e. the (w) does not show on the outer window and only after you highlight it? So the code from 0001-Add-SD-16-9-formats-to-BD-render.patch would look like below:
{ "720x576 25i", 720,576, 25., 0, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x576 25p*", 720,576, 25., 0, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED },
* { "720x576(w) 25i", 720,576, 25., 1, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x576(w) 25p*", 720,576, 25., 1, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED },* { "720x480 29.97i", 720,480, 29.97, 0, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x480 29.97p*", 720,480, 29.97, 0, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED }, { "720x480(w) 29.97i", 720,480, 29.97, 1, ILACE_MODE_BOTTOM_FIRST }, { "720x480(w) 29.97p*", 720,480, 29.97, 1, ILACE_MODE_NOTINTERLACED },
no objection, nice catch!
So as not to send bigger files to the Mailing List, I will send to Andrew, png shots.
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:22 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created.
It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
Checked the 4 BD 16x9, etc. patches into GIT. Changed 2 things mentioned earlier which was (1) combining (w) of the last 2 options for 720x576 and 720x480 and (2) a long time error in displaying "* non-standard" when using any of the progressive options which was written over. Forgot to mention that I had tested on both the Samsung bluray player attached to the TV and the LG attached to a really old non-digital TV -- in testing on real TVs sometimesit is confusing as the newer digital TV (which is still 15 years old!) often compensates for different media and the older non-digital TV is just plain stupid. On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 12:22 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < [email protected]> wrote:
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created.
It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
Den 16.01.2024 08:04, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
I tried to edit in place ff_options before batchrender job was created.
It seems to work but need real (on real hardware player + TV) testing ...
Just tested BD Render with Einhander's latest CinGG built: Jan 19 2024 22:51:47 The first question is if this "BD creation aspect 16:9 fixes" is included here or not? Loaded a hdv 1440x1080 25i file BD Render Format was discovered correct 1440x1080 25i Scaled (tried also None without difference) Default playback of bd.m2ts with VLC was visible ok - that is no visible DAR by changing to 16:9 By verifying the I/O files with ffprobe: * Input #0, mpegts, from 'hdv07_05.m2t': * Video: mpeg2video (Main) ([2][0][0][0] / 0x0002), yuv420p(tv, bt709, top first), 1440x1080 [SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9], 25000 kb/s, 25 fps, 25 tbr, 90k tbn, 50 tbc * Input #0, mpegts, from 'bd.m2ts': * Video: h264 (High) ([27][0][0][0] / 0x001B), yuv420p(tv, bt709, top first), 1440x1080 [SAR 20833:15625 DAR 83332:46875], 25 fps, 25 tbr, 90k tbn, 50 tbc That is for bd.m2ts: * SAR=20833:15625=1.3333 * DAR=83332:46875=1.7777 Comment: I would be easier to see/verify if possibly [SAR 4:3 DAR 16:9] simply could be used also for bd.m2ts Else good so far regarding HDV 1440x1024 to bd.m2ts ^
Just tested BD Render with Einhander's latest CinGG built: Jan 19 2024 22:51:47 The first question is if this "BD creation aspect 16:9 fixes" is included here or not?
Yes, they should be as the 16:9 fixes were checked into GIT on 18 January so they would be included in Andrey's 19 January build.
participants (3)
-
Andrew Randrianasulu -
Phyllis Smith -
Terje J. Hanssen