[Cin] flac 1.4.0

[Phyllis Smith]

>
>> PATCH * rendered 2712 frames in 1.595 secs, 1700.313 fps    11448186 =
>> size
>> OLD:  ** rendered 2712 frames in 0.190 secs, 14273.684 fps   11474493 =
>> size
>> NEW: ** rendered 2712 frames in 4.646 secs,     583.728 fps     9448273 =
>> size
>>
>> AND NOW** rendered 2712 frames in 0.410 secs     6614.634 fps   11448186
- size
so definitely improved but what does Andrea see?

I still am of the opinion that we should not upgrade or maybe wait for
>> 1.4.x where x is some future fixes ??
>>
>
> I think compression level patch should work even with old flac
>
>
> but yeah, you have some monster machine so may be new flac not as good as
> old one on it especially.
>
The tests I am running are only on a fairly good laptop, not the monster
Amd epyc desktop.

>
> can you try command line FLAC  compressor from 1.3 and 1.4 on same machine
> too?
>
I will see if I can figure out how to do this, but probably not until late
tomorrow.

>
>> On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 1:14 PM Andrew Randrianasulu <
>> randrianasulu at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> can you try also this patch on top of previous flac patch?
>>>
>>> in theory it should add flac compression level support in gui
>>>
>>> чт, 15 сент. 2022 г., 15:40 Andrea paz <gamberucci.andrea at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Applying the patch and then rendering without touching anything I get
>>>> the same result as before: twice as long and 4.7 MB in size. The
>>>> default is: compression_level=5.
>>>>
>>>> Applying the patch and then varying the render parameter
>>>> (compression_level=0):
>>>>
>>>> 0.664 sec
>>>> 13711 fps
>>>> 44.6 MB
>>>>
>>>> Good thing to have introduced the render parameters (well explained)
>>>> so that the speed/size choice is left to the user.
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20220915/0c617e95/attachment.htm>