[Cin] Issues related to Motion Plugin
miro.rovis at croatiafidelis.hr
Wed Sep 28 16:18:23 CEST 2022
On 220928-13:48+0700, Georgy Salnikov wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2022, Miroslav Rovis wrote:
> > Here's how my tentative with the shaker2.xml and the video went:
> > https://croatiafidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-220925-cinelerra/pg-220926-motion.php
> > The files necessary are there (as I got them in email that
> > missed to be sent to Cin ML).
> > Why it did not produce the expected result? (I haven't examined
> > the XML-after yet, but it's available on the page.)
> Miroslav, you have tested everything right. Your result is the
> same as mine.
> OK, the result is in reality not perfect. By finer tuning the
> plugin parameters and keyframes placement achieving better
> results is in principle possible. But this particular example
> was only a testcase for me - to verify that the algorithm
> works. Getting visually perfect results was not my goal.
> Georgy Salnikov
> NMR Group
> Novosibirsk Institute of Organic Chemistry
> Lavrentjeva, 9, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
> Phone +7-383-3307864
> Email sge at nmr.nioch.nsc.ru
Well, that clears some of my doubts regarding motion plugin.
And there is one good thing this demostrates, if your result and
my result are identical: consistency of the program, It may be
long to go to get reproducibility [*]. I hope Cinelerra will be
reproducible one day.
Regards, kind developer!
[*] such as e.g. Debian is
striving for: https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds . I for
myself can state that when I compiled Getmail, I did get the
exact same binaries out as the then current getmail package in
Debian, as I reported in https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/issues/123
However, long to go for Debian to be really reproducible as
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Cin