[Cin] Checked updated x264 into GIT

[Phyllis Smith]

Andrea, maybe a comment should be added instead to prores_ks.pro?  Because
when I tested 2 different rendered files although playing them looked the
same, I used "vfy" to compare the output from existing prores_ks versus
with the "vemdor=ap10" and internally something is different.  And when I
do a "mediainfo" on existing, I get "Writing library  lavc" (which I
believe means libavcodec and is open source) and on the changed one, I get
"Writing library  Apple".

Sounds like a really good idea to put it in the preset so users are aware
of its existence as a comment but not sure if that would be controversial
to Apple.

What do you think?

>
> PS: I propose a very small change to the "prores_ks.pro" preset. The
> addition of the "vendor=apl0" option is to make the various programs
> believe that it was rendered with the official Adobe engine. I don't
> see any difference, however I propose to leave it in this preset
> anyway in case some people might find it useful and solve some
> compatibility issues. I attach the preset.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/pipermail/cin/attachments/20230404/4720817b/attachment.htm>